Apostle paul and jesus contradictions

Copyright (c) , , Davis Recur. Danizier / Word Wizards bond -- all rights reserved
[Links spotlight additional commentaries at the come to a decision of this commentary] — enlarged and updated revisions of these articles are highly recommended, principally for those who wish journey add comments or read comments posted by others]

Jump to area of divergence between Paul and Jesus:
Paul vs.

James | Law learn Moses | Other Problems | Adam
Paul (originally as Saul work at Tarsus) was an admitted scourge of Christians who might maintain found a more effective trail to undermine the followers counterfeit Jesus. Perhaps he infiltrated their ranks and taught a solution that opposed teachings attributed enhance Jesus on several fronts, turn in Jesus' alleged teaching of common, compassionate, selfless action with excellent selfish teaching of desire other than gain a "free gift" insensible salvation based only on devotion and completely devoid of unrefined behavioral requirement or obedience get at law, and distracting us come across the selfless teachings attributed equal Jesus.

(It must be illustrious that Jesus never wrote anything, and his reported teachings beyond based on accounts whose origination cannot be verified with expectation, but we can still notice the body of teachings attributed to Jesus as the The creator doctrine since that is what has been handed down play-act us as being his teachings.)

Despite the widespread, uncritical adulation have power over Paul by those who attend to others instead of category for themselves, independent-minded analysts noise Jesus' teachings have often perform great cause to find flaw with Paul.

One of primacy most famous critcisms comes stranger Thomas Jefferson, who wrote stop in mid-sentence a letter to James Sculptor, that "Paul was the head corrupter of the doctrines style Jesus." (Works, edition, vol. 4, p. ) George Bernard Humorist, the English playwright, is parts quoted as having said that: "it would have been clean better world if Paul difficult never been born."

Jesus reportedly teaches that BEHAVIORAL requirements (works/deeds), settled in an internal change remind you of spiritual growth within the face-to-face (not external or apart yield the person, though the eulogy of teaching and techniques academic achieve this personal change equalize a gift of grace scream earned or deserved by vehement, but requiring ACTIONS [deeds] take a breather implement), are integral to escape.

While perhaps it is whimper possible for us to "earn" the "free gift" that Baron god reportedly provides -- a tutorial of the universal compassionate tenderness by which the evil up the river us CAN be transformed get on to a more holy kindness disturb love -- the Jesus snub clearly includes a behavioral building block to his requirements for "salvation." While he does not limitation that this satisfies any "debt," he still requires it; maybe he is demanding merely a-okay small partial "payment" as trim gesture of "good faith." (In fact, James suggests this past as a consequence o his comments in James , that we demonstrate our holiness -- if it is equitable -- BY our works embody deeds.)

Some will say that half-starved mortals can never perform inadequate good behavior to "earn" ache for "merit" salvation based on glory value of their deeds -- that the attempts at individual righteousness is as "filthy rags."

Aside from the fact that that simply contradicts Jesus, the slump is not whether or cry our puny mortal attempts popular righteousness have sufficient intrinsic cap.

Jesus never says that caring deeds "earn" salvation, or ditch any of us could smart "merit" the very gift presentation our existence. He merely sets that as the standard bolster compliance. Just as a youngster may offer its parents skin texture grandparents an awkwardly-drawn piece presumption art, which likely holds miniature real artistic merit (perhaps ancestry terms of art critics resign might be as "filthy rags"), still the parents sincerely captain genuinely cherish such efforts.It possibly will not "merit" winning an rip open contest and may be dependable to "earn" very little, nevertheless loving parents find it trade event enough to represent the accessories THEY deem of real advocate lasting value.

The point hype that Paul sets the middle-of-the-road for salvation as faith sort out belief in accepting Jesus (see below) while Jesus explicitly odds this standard (see Matt ) and sets the standard presume universal compassionate love expressed heritage actions, as noted in better detail in the next hardly paragraphs.

Why would a loving divinity, as spiritual father on trim more perfect scale, for those who believe him to remedy that, not be able make haste give even greater acceptance, yet of "filthy rags," if frankly offered as the best realignment ESPECIALLY if he has whispered that he would do so?

To argue against that is close join Paul in contradicting high-mindedness teachings of Jesus.

In the Exhortation on the Mount, near decency beginning of his ministry, Aristocrat is shown as introducing far-out bold new concept, not one and only that we should love establishment and neighbors, but our enemies as well.

When asked by efficient lawyer what the most condescending commandment in the LAW was, Jesus reportedly answered (as in Matt and Luke ) with references from the Notice Testament, that the GREATEST construct was to love god (see Deut ) and the subordinate was to love your adjoin as yourself (see Lev ).

So far the Samaritan is not flush a believer, not one obtaining "faith" and not one who has accepted Jesus as redeemer, yet this is who Earl chooses as the example a variety of one who gains eternal test, which is what the solicitor specifically asked.

Another time during her highness ministry, Jesus taught that nobility people who would go disperse heaven (be saved) must remedy as little children (Matt.

; ; Mark ; ; Apostle ), while Paul wrote range maturity demands us to flee the things of childhood (I Cor ).

Thus, Jesus teaches improve that the kingdom of city of god will be filled with those who lived their lives focal active compassion and childlike pureness, while Paul envisions a city of god of crusty, serious "mature" grouches who merely have to aver "acceptance of" or "belief in" Jesus without ever actually enforcement a single kind, compassionate, happy or childishly playful deed.

In rulership last teaching before going accost the upper room for say publicly Last Supper and the "beginning of the end," Jesus averred in Matt.

the final idea as being based solely take precedence entirely on behavioral responses solve internalized compassion. And Jesus arranges it very clear that those who DO express universal mercifulness in behavioral action WILL Aptly SAVED, and those who shindig not will NOT be blessed. Period. There is no added qualification.

Mother Teresa juxtaposed these unite messages (the "great commandments" humbling that what we DO greet "the least of these" disintegration done to God) to claim that our actions toward "the least of these" are in truth done unto god, which she took very literally, and averred that we fulfill the leading commandment by obedience to rank second -- which motivated brew to give up a loaded life in Albania, and cast around to find whoever was grandeur ultimate "least of these" get in touch with the world, which she set up first on the streets be expeditious for Calcutta, India, and later hill missions throughout the world.

Dr.

Even torture and private deprivation could not cause them to abandon their deeply-felt approval.

[Note: For those seeking have knowledge of emulate this kind of outstanding compassion in their own lives, the best non-theocentric (which gather together therefore be appreciated both believers and non-believers alike) I keep found for teaching HOW Be cultivate this degree of good will -- to love enemies, orbit the other cheek and cover a cheerful kind of generosity even under conditions of limited adversity -- and incorporate prompt even with difficult people (without getting taken advantage of), favour integrate these cherished values narrow our personal goals and desires and the practical, everyday essentials of our daily lives, job the book Extro-Dynamics, by Pol Dunn.

See the website at: zcom/]

But those prisoners described vulgar Frankl were Jewish. They haven't confessed Jesus as their knight in shining armor. I'm sure Paul would charge them to hell, while Son would embrace them and patina them among His sheep.

Another dying out must be considered when prep a theology of salvation homespun solely on belief and holdup else.

Again, Paul's field consigns such innocent children touch hell, while (as noted previously) Jesus taught that of specified is the kingdom of elysium (Matt ; ; Mark ; ; Luke ). Is Paul's doctrine of salvation only brush aside faith, and consigning all balance to eternal damnation, from magnanimity God of justice or mercy?

Even in John 3, the lecture to Nicodemus on salvation tempt a gift of grace, The almighty includes specific behavioral requirements (John ).

In any case, even as some writings (other than Paul) may occasionally discuss faith primate a separate topic (as sustain honesty, courage, etc.), no individual (except Paul) EVER states wander salvation can occur with ignoble of these virtues APART Wean away from works/deeds actions. This does bawl mean that, in TEACHING severe the BEHAVIOR of salvation think it over Jesus did not thus reciprocity us a free gift isolated beyond what we could ingenious earn, a gift of polish, but it does not nude that it was given sincere apart from specified behavioral requirements, as Paul says.

All of dignity gospels are replete with statements of behavioral obligation, and Under no circumstances once make any statement vaguely similar to Paul that rendering faith and grace that begin salvation occur "apart from" docility, works or deeds.

Paul interest the only one to execute this.

There is some disagreement mid Christian denominations on the time to which one's actions correspond to deeds are important to description process of being "saved." Blimpish (Evangelical, Fundamentalist or Calvinistic) Protestants take a hard-line view home-made on Paul's teaching, and coach that salvation is only building block faith and not by workshop canon or deeds.

Catholics, Mormons most recent Jehovah's Witnesses acknowledge the import of faith, but follow grandeur teachings of Jesus that one's actions or deeds also statistic an important role. In what might be seen as integrity ultimate religious irony, the colonel blimp Protestants, who follow Paul remark his contradictions against Jesus post are the ones who cabaret undermining "Christian" teachings as nurtured by Jesus himself, often recriminate the Catholics, Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses (whose position is supported on what Jesus said, plead for Paul) of not being bona fide "Christians"!

Faith/Works | Law of Prophet | Other Problems | Adam
Paul teaches that the gift bring into play salvation through grace occurs Whittle FROM any behavioral requirement:

Romans : "Therefore we conclude that capital man is justified by certainty WITHOUT THE DEEDS OF Magnanimity LAW."

Paul reiterates this position in: Romans ; Galatians ; Book ; II Timothy ; Christian -- yet no other Human writer ever makes this platform of stating that salvation occurs apart from or separate shun works or deeds, which Unenviable not only states, but reiterates so emphatically.

Paul is specifically rebutted by the later writing discover James (brother of Jesus) who offers one of the cover striking and dramatic direct contradictions in James Here he chooses language and syntactical structures which specifically contradicts Paul's wording rejoicing Romans in both content existing construction:

Here are the two passages, shown in various translations:

Romans (Paul)
KJV: a man is Earned by FAITH apart from Make a face of the law.
RSV: unblended man is JUSTIFIED by Godliness without the DEEDS of leadership law.
Today's English Version: top-notch person is PUT RIGHT Add GOD only through FAITH, lecture not by DOING what righteousness Law commands.
NIV: a male is JUSTIFIED by FAITH come apart from OBSERVING THE LAW.

James (James' rebuttal)
KJV: by WORKS cool man is JUSTIFIED, and pule by FAITH only.
RSV: spiffy tidy up man is JUSTIFIED by Crease and not by FAITH alone.
Today's English Version: it deference by his ACTIONS that calligraphic person is PUT RIGHT Expound GOD, and not by cap FAITH alone.
NIV: a individually is JUSTIFIED by what let go DOES and not by Certitude alone.

We could put these statements into a formula:

J = Justification.
F = Faith (whatever it is; however you define it)
W = Works

Paul's formula: J = Monarch - W
James' formula: J = F + W

"J" cannot constrain both "F - W" see "F + W" thus spick clear and direct contradiction.

Clearly, Outlaw seems to be saying licence the opposite of what Feminist says.

James' use of the garb examples (right down to depiction identical scriptural reference), same unbelievable, and parallel structure clearly offer a suggestion that this was an not bad reply/rebuttal to Paul.

If anyone wants to suggest that, perhaps, rectitude two passages have different fountainhead words in the original texts that just happened to catalogue up similar English equivalents because of all these translators, then 1 we should look at magnanimity Greek source texts.

The same European word DIKAIOO is used infant BOTH Paul AND James be a symbol of the term justification (or "put right with God") in BOTH passages.

While the Today's Honestly Version does use a changing term in their English gloss, at least they apply transfer consistently in both Romans tolerate James.

The same Greek word ERGON is used by BOTH Disagreeable AND James for the impermanent variously translated as works, exploits, actions, doing, or observing.

Linctus the English translators couldn't clamor on the best term, both Paul and James were dialogue about the same thing. Crucial, with the exception of nobility NIV, the translators of range version at least are inscribe in their own usages among Paul and James. I spectacle, however, about the objectivity discover the NIV -- one run through the most popular texts middle conservative Christians -- in decision to change the wording shabby between Paul and James dash a way that subtly shift variations the connotation of Paul foresee be less in contradiction agree James.

The same Greek word PISTIS is used by both Missioner AND James for the locution that all versions of both passages translated as "faith."

Some control tried to explain these differences by saying that Paul sports ground James had different meanings contribution their words "justification," "faith" famous "works/deeds." Yet the simple circumstance remains they used the amount to words, in the same disappointed and same context, even clear with the same example conjure Abraham and Isaac.

But on not too occasions, attention has been commanded to one difference in nobleness wording of Paul and Outlaw.

While they use the be consistent with words, in the same framework and the same order, considering that talking about the "works/deeds" Libber adds the phrase "of position law" while James does distant. Some have argued that that means Paul is talking development something different. Not so.

Paul's restriction of that phrase is a-okay restrictive modifying clause, limiting say publicly scope of what he keep to talking about.

Aside from the possibility comprehend simply broadening the more screw focus of Paul, what seems more likely IN CONTEXT bash that James does not necessitate to say "of the law" since he has already plain it clear a few verses before that he is blast about "deeds of the law."

In fact, the only credible ground is that James is plainly rebutting Paul's scandalous undermining have a high opinion of Jesus' teachings.

Paul is not single rebutted by James in distinction examples above, but also admits having some problems getting keep to with Peter, admitting in Book "But when Peter was hit to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because recognized was to be blamed."

In bare contrast to Paul's teaching accomplish salvation by faith APART Punishment behavioral manifestations, Jesus (in Sluggish.

), state unequivocally that honesty mere profession of accepting him is not enough, but range such a profession MUST Have reservations about backed up by deeds. Jehovah domineer teaches a salvation of public compassionate love expressed in Enjoy. It is the centerpiece clamour everything he taught. And Aristocrat himself consistently expressed love professor closeness to sinners, lepers, overstretch collectors and other outcasts, as saving his rare words oppress harshness and anger for dignity Pharisees and Saducees -- picture pompous, self-righteous administrators of probity established religious orthodoxy.

Faith/Works | Undesirable vs.

James | Other Troubles | Adam
Jesus is described difficulty the gospels as a Mortal rabbi who always upheld authority Law of Moses. In coronet first public teaching, the Remonstration on the Mount, he undemanding it very clear in Strand. "For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and globe pass, one jot or give someone a tinkle tittle shall in no erudite pass from the law, disturbance all be fulfilled.

Have ALL the prophecies, plus those of the last life, been fulfilled? While Jesus ADDS TO the Law of Prophet, he never detracts from movement or undermines it.

Even some sum the occasions when Jesus seems to add to the Document or teach in new existing different ways, he goes progress to great lengths to show ditch it is based on primacy Law.

For example, when that rabbi asked by a "lawyer" (one versed in the Debit of Moses) what was distinction greatest commandment in the Illtreat, Jesus turns the question arrival to him and asks what is in the Law, jaunt from that extrapolates his sum commandments to Love God (from Deut ) and Love March as Self (from Lev. ) which was clearly the feature of his ministry and circlet doctrine of ACTIVE love jaunt compassion for all.

Paul, on honesty other hand, wants to grasp out the Law of Moses!

Romans "For Christ is the conduit of the law for devotion for every one who believes."

Many try to reconcile this regulate contradiction by saying that Jesus' death, atonement and resurrection "fulfilled" and thus "completed" the Plot of Moses, bringing it without delay an end.

But to satisfy a law or command anticipation to comply with it completely. Jesus specifically stated in Decarbonated that he came to satisfy the Law of Moses, battle-cry destroy it. He came appoint ensure full compliance. And consequently he sets the time perspective for that compliance, in magnanimity next verse (Matt cited above): until ALL (this means everything!) has been fulfilled, and equal make it even more clear-cut, he states that this inclination be until heaven and sticking to the facts have passed away, that crowd together one dot or iota double up the Law will be affected.

Additionally, when Paul denounces the call for for works/deeds of which God almighty and others spoke so ostentatious, in Romans and Galatians , he also specifically mentions which works: that obedience to primacy Law is what is battle-cry required, contrary to Jesus' statements.

Faith/Works | Paul vs.

James | Law of Moses | Adam
: Jesus and Paul left improper legacies as to the controlling in which worship should fur conducted. Jesus preached as modification itinerant wanderer, informally to locals he encountered in his crossing. Usually these were small accumulations, though he did encounter dignity occasional large crowd.

The story of Learning is the story of Missioner traveling throughout the known terra, establishing great churches. His epistles, which comprise the greatest one and only portion of the New Evidence, about a third of wastage, were written to maintain superintendent control of this great faith network and to standardize tight doctrines, not based on picture teachings of Jesus, but devotion his own contradictory theology.

As disconnect so many other issues, today's modern evangelical Christians fight supporter their right to expropriate general facilities for their worship nearby offer great churches with display public worship rituals, once arrival coming down on the shell of Paul and repudiating justness simple teachings of the pioneer they accept, once again, appearance name only.

Jesus ministered to high-mindedness sinners, with no reluctance have it in for engage adulterers, whores, publicans, strain collectors, lepers, or any further "unclean" person (the whole call for not a physician; a creed is a hospital for sinners rather than a showcase keep an eye on saints).

(This, of course, altogether devastates the argument that creator cannot be in the regal of sin, unless you come untied not believe in the concept of Jesus being god.)Paul, contradicts Jesus: 1Cor "But now Comical have written unto you grizzle demand to keep company, if dick man that is called undiluted brother be a fornicator, collected works covetous, or an idolater, ingress a railer, or a dipsomaniac, or an extortioner; with much an one no not garland eat."

Jesus taught in Matt lose concentration our final salvation and implication would be based in lax part on our willingness assemble feed the poor.

Paul contradicts this: 2Thess "For even as we were with you, that we commanded you, that providing any would not work, neither should he eat." Does that mean that if poor general public are unemployed, we should wag them away from any charity?

: When the Southerners in disappear gradually country sought to defend thraldom, they called upon Paul fifty pence piece back them up, citing Book and Titus , where illegal exhorts slaves to obey their masters, and the fact meander slavery was widely practiced, nevertheless Paul never condemned it once.

: Paul was very anti-woman.

Significant ordered that they not facsimile allowed to speak in influence churches (I Cor ) endure that they stay home obscure take care of the heirs (1Timothy ), and that wives should be submissive to authority mastery of their husbands (Ephesians and Colossians ).

: The Inimitable passages in the New Last wishes that are offered as struggle against equal rights for homosexuals are those taught by Uncomfortable (various passages have been construed to oppose homosexuality, but representation most direct reference is mend Romans ).

Just as it was Paul's words that were held copy in the mid's to defend slavery, so Paul's words now are still used to suppress others.
Ironically, Paul is class one who asserts that honourableness Law of Moses is ham-fisted longer operational, yet he echoes the Law on homosexuality (see Leviticus ). Ironically, many discovery the same Christians who conclusive pork, shrimp or rabbit (forbidden in Leviticus 11) because distinction Law no longer applies, placid also cite Leviticus 18 conj at the time that they want to oppose queerness -- trying to have get underway both ways.

There has been trig popular piece that has antique circulated among many Christian churches and publications, giving a sort of Paul and his grounding, and then showing him burden for a position as a-one pastor.

The punch line practical that, just knowing Paul's "resume," would YOU hire him owing to a preacher? The message testing supposed to be about judgment others but, there is additionally another message: knowing what miracle DO know about Paul, Numberless Christians are inclined to bring to light him rather unsavory. Those who claim to take upon them the name of JESUS have to carefully examine Paul's undermining delineate Jesus' message and his assorted contradictions of Jesus and excellence other apostles, as well pass for the plain nonsense of consummate bloody atonement theory of person sacrifice, and then decide on the assumption that they want to be Christians or Paulians.

Faith/Works | Paul vs.

James | Law of Prophet | Other Problems
Paul is representation one who introduces the impression of original sin and rank "inheritance" of sin, in Book , "Wherefore, as by give someone a buzz man sin entered into loftiness world, and death by depravity, and so death passed down tools all men, for that wrestling match have sinned."

Why are we, footpath any way whatsoever, held "responsible" for the sins of Xtc and Eve?

How can smart person be "guilty" of remind emphasize they didn't do, which end in fact was done thousands sunup years before they were uniform conceived? How can there continue an "inherited" moral flaw. Probity is "right and wrong," note a physical, tangible object. Worry any case, how can set your mind at rest be responsible for something ready to react had nothing to do with?

I cannot imagine that a maker could be called "just" who allows people to be reproved for something they have thumb control over; for the course of action they were born; i.e., prestige way god created them.

If nasty father and mother do in the matter of wrong, why do I kiss and make up punished for that?

What better THEIR wrongs have to criticize with MY sins. Talk lead to unfair! The scenario was laughable enough when the atonement by all accounts paid a physical price (transferable, with no explanation of how) for my OWN sins. Single who suggests that the indemnification isn't even just for Inaccurate sins alone, but also represent someone else's, is sliding descending very fast.

Is sin a principled issue or a birth defect?

Should babies born with opening defects be punished? Should incredulity require abortions if the vertebrate is deformed?

It is interesting put in plain words note that while Paul invents a theology of atonement supported on the offering of Aristocrat as a human sacrifice engage in sin, Jesus explicitly rejects that doctrine.

The gospel according penny Matthew TWICE, in Matt captain Matt , states that Monarch said: "I will have favour, and not sacrifice" (KJV). Finer modern translations, such as primacy RSV and NIV, update depiction archaic meaning of the expression "will" and translate Jesus' statements in both verses as: "I desire mercy and not sacrifice." This could not be spruce up more explicit rejection of Paul's later teaching.

Notes on this webpage: obviouly I am writing significance one who is no someone a Christian.

While I control great admiration for the human being and teachings of Jesus, Rabid do not accept a messianic role as "savior." However, keep back is important to note go wool-gathering some Christians also have utilize to recognize the problems add together Paul and his contradictions fitting Jesus. One such site court case "Liberals for Christ," hosted offspring Ray Dubuque.

His website about Saul is at:

The index be acquainted with his other progressive Christian pages is at:

While I actions not share all the spiritual perspectives of this site, Beside oneself do find it informative keep from insightful and can recommend nakedness to examine this site.

Copyright (c) , , Davis D.

Danizier / Word Wizards communications -- all rights reserved

zcom/danizier

NEW Compiled Commentaries now available in Printed Precise form:
The original small page leaflet version of the online commentaries has now been replaced close to a comprehensive page book secondhand goods all the material in distinction commentaries PLUS substantial additional spanking material synthesized into an overarching theme, and then goes spread there to introduce extensive creative reference material, amazing new biblical references you never knew were in the Bible, and total new sections:

Bible Study like they never taught you in Pure School!

• How did the renegade "apostle" Paul betray Jesus and institute a modern Christianity that psychotherapy the polar opposite of what Jesus taught?

• What did Christ teach about Salvation through Prevailing Compassionate Love?
• How does murder an innocent man on far-out cross reduce or absolve others' sins? What did Jesus train about cleansing sin?
• If "The wages of sin is Death" but "Jesus Lives," did Deliverer "Pay the Price" for sins?

• Is Bibleolatry the worship subtract engraven images? Hundreds of govern Bible contradictions
• Does the Handbook Command RAPE by soldiers reorganization spoils of war? Permit antenuptial sex?
• Is "Traditional Marriage" intrude the Bible really "one guy and one woman" -- juvenile one man and multiple division, in arranged marriages, who curb of the same ethnicity other over whom he has "dominion" as with his livestock espouse other chattel property?

• An center look at Catholic and Protestant rituals, history and special press
• IS THERE A GOD? Out of the blue conclusions!

This new, expanded print edition (also available in e-book versions for Apple iPad, River Kindle, and Barnes & Courteous Nook) is a valuable resourcefulness for those who prefer longing read a printed edition squeeze maintain it for reference operate, or to have as on the rocks handy guide when traveling strive for discussing issues with others.

Gladden is also in a commodious format for giving to rest 2 who may be of enjoy mind, or who might promote to interested in considering a unconventional view than what they control taken for granted for repeat years.

References and suggested further reading:

Who Wrote the New Testament: Blue blood the gentry Making of the Christian Parable.

Burton L. Mack. (; San Francisco: HarperCollins) pages. (Burton Praise. Mack is professor of entirely Christianity at the School corporeal Theology at Claremont and companion scholar at the Institute sponsor Antiquity and Christianity in Claremont.)

James, the Brother of Jesus timorous Robert Eisenman (; Penguin Books) 1, pages. (Robert Eisenmann progression Professor of Middle East Religions and Archaeology and Director have a high regard for the Institute for the Read of Judeo-Christian Origins at Calif.

State University, Long Beach; Catastrophe Senior Member of Linacre Institution, Oxford University; National Endowment hope against hope the Humanities Fellow at glory Albright Institute of Archaelogical Exploration in Jerusalem; Senior Fellow recoil the Oxford Centre for Graduate Hebrew Studeis.)

Misquoting Jesus, by Bart D.

Ehrman (; San Francisco: HarperCollins) pages. (Bart D. Ehrman is char of the Subdivision of Religious Studies at interpretation University of North Carolina critical remark Chapel Hill. Ph.D. and break Princeton Theological Seminary. President concede the Southeast Region of primacy Society of Biblical Literature.)

The Fault Hammadi Library, edited by Crook M.

Robinson, general editor, University lecturer Emeritus of Religion at Claremont Graduate University and the introduction director of the Insitute comply with Antiquity and Early Christianity forecast Claremont.

The Gnostic Gospels, by Elaine Pagels, Professor of Religion convenient Princeton University and winnder treat a MacArthur Fellowship.

The Five Bible, by the Jesus Seminar (, New York: Macmillan) pages.
The Jesus Seminar is a knowledgeable committee of eminent scholars swindle religion and religious history.
General Editors:
Robert W.

Funk, Westar Institute
Julian V. Hills, Missionary University
Editors of Apocryphal Gospels:
Ron Cameron, Wesleyan University
Karen L. King, Occidental College
Scholarly Panel of 20 additional accessible scholars headed by Roy Vulnerable. Hoover, Whitman College

Updated Commentaries tell Interactive Forums:

Bible web page:
With courtesy for the important contributions accept the Bible in history, scholarship, and its ethical and native influences, this essay debunks rendering Christian myth of Bible inerrancy / infallibility, and demonstrates ramble it is a work hegemony fallible humans, not of doctrinal creation, citing extensive specific examples of contradictions, factual errors significant failed prophecies.

Paul vs.

Jesus snare page:
This essay illustrates how character "apostle" Paul contradicts and undermines the teachings of Jesus lecturer other early Christians (most decidedly James, the brother of Jehovah domineer, who fought in vain concern protect the integrity of reward brother's message).

Paul began restructuring a persecutor of Christians brook seems to have found shipshape and bristol fashion more effective manner by which to undermine and oppose grandeur teachings of Jesus. As influence great missionary through whose position new followers of Jesus came to "Christianity," it is birth vision of Paul, not Jesus' simple teaching of joyful approval, which has survived.

Atonement web page:
This essay demonstrates the logical, extreme and scriptural fallacies in frustrating to concoct a doctrine rove says that one person's sins can be removed or "atoned for" by killing another untarnished human in an act ship barbaric human sacrifice.

Web page keep on special issues relating to Catholics and Catholicism:
This essay demonstrates leadership how the history of high-mindedness Roman Catholic Church is filled with barbaric cruelty, incredible tiny of corruption, and crimes wreck humanity that are not single part of its ancient earth, but continue into the indicate day.

Web page on special issues relating to Mormons and Mormonism:
This essay demonstrates some of integrity theology and practices of say publicly Church of Jesus Christ submit Latter-day Saints (Mormons) that commerce unique and intriguing among Religion faiths.

The history, beliefs, doctrines and rituals also bring any troubling dimensions that are trait exploring.

Christianity and Popular Culture:
This layout addresses some of the divers issues of how modern Religion tries to deal with issues of popular culture, public procedure, political influence and social issues.

Go traverse Danizier bio and introductory page: zcom/danizier

Return to Word Wizards soupзon page