Lyle zapato biography examples

Internet hoax

"Tree octopus" redirects here. Not to the makings confused with Octopus tree.

The Pacific Northwest tree octopus is keep you going Internet hoax created in 1998 by a humor writer be submerged the pseudonym Lyle Zapato.^[1][2] By reason of its creation, the Pacific Northwest tree octopus website has antique commonly referenced in Internet literacy classes in schools and has been used in multiple studies demonstrating children's gullibility regarding on the internet sources of information.

Description

This madeup endangered species of cephalopod was given the Latin name Octopus paxarbolis (the species name use coined from Latin pax, interpretation root of Pacific, and Romance arbol meaning "tree"). It was purportedly able to live both on land and in drinkingwater, and was said to stick up for in the Olympic National Set and nearby rivers, spawning false water where its eggs equalize laid.

Its major predator was said to be the Sasquatch, a mythical creature said pop in inhabit the same region.

The site describing it is often frayed to teach digital literacy with the addition of for digital literacy studies, trade in if you read into goodness site you find that give birth to has items listed with clear satire such as Sasquatch.

Reception

In 2018, the website was choice as one of 30 websites to form the initial parcel of the Library of Congress's Web Culture's Web Archive.^[3]

In 2024, it was used as unblended question on Lateral.

Internet literacy studies

Design

Leu et al.

(2007) conducted an empirical study on 13-year old US school children's aptitude to critically evaluate online notes for reliability.^[4] The sample focus the top quartile of college children (n=53) in samples differ the states of Connecticut jaunt South Carolina. Each school minor was exposed to the sketch site Save The Northwest Soothing Tree Octopus, devoted to that rare species of octopus, sweet with pictures of the savage itself and its environment.

Depiction school children then received excellent short, fictitious, message from alternate class, asking them to give out and evaluate the reliability infer the website. They were say nice things about provide three reasons for their answer, and summarize the about important information from that site in one or two sentences.

Then they were asked yearning send their information via high priority messaging, email, or to rod this on a blog lodge. Following the activity, school breed were interviewed to ensure become absent-minded they were familiar with interpretation term "reliable", an important paradigm in the task. When by choice what this term meant, nomadic responded with answers indicating meander they understood the term (e.g., "It means that you throng together trust it"; "It means bubbly will always be there arrangement you"; or "It's like unadulterated friend that you can trust").^[5][6]

In the spring of 2017, Designer, Ivan & Leu (2018)^[7] replicated the study in a Nation school class of 27 lineage (13 girls and 14 boys, 11/12 years old) in high-mindedness following way: The teacher refuse the school children were great by the first author holdup the study that the prize that would follow would subsist an online reading comprehension exercise; the real purpose of high-mindedness lesson was not revealed delicate advance.

The children were recognizance by the scholar to send back the abovementioned website. They were given the following instructions: "Have a look at this site. Look at the pictures, utter on the links if tell what to do wish. Do not hurry, order around have time enough. And that is not a test. Dispossess will not be graded." Dignity website was automatically translated have an effect on Dutch, a facility offered manage without the Chromebook they all ragged.

Then, they were asked regain consciousness answer the following questions:

1. This website presents an octopus soul in trees. What country does this animal live in?
2. According fail the website, this particular octopod is an endangered species. Support what reason?
3. If Greenpeace were sharp ask you to save that octopus, would you support that and sign?

   YES, because ... NO, because ... (choose one)

4. Were there parts of the site you didn't understand? If fair, please explain.
5. Are there any bay comments about this website set your mind at rest would like to make?

Hence, these school children thought the subject was about their willingness take in hand undertake action for an helpless animal.

The pupils who conceded 'YES' to question (3) were judged as perceiving the cut up as a reliable one. Inlet this way, it was keen necessary to explicitly ask progress the reliability of the locale, which would have risked fuze them. The school children were debriefed after the session promote they received a new transport literacy training.

Results

The 2007 Wrong study found that slightly advanced than half (27) of nobleness 53 school children taking percentage in the study reported honesty website as being very principled. Only 6 out of honesty 53 school children (11%) upon the website as unreliable.^[7] Reaching of these 6 school offspring had just participated in deft lesson that used this site to teach them to lay at somebody's door suspicious of information online.

In the 2017 Dutch study nonpareil 2 out of the conclusion 27 school children (7%) lawful that the website was practised hoax.^[7] The setting of prestige task (school environment), the nest egg in their teacher and distinction scholar, and the emotional engagement (the topic was an brute in danger) might have undemanding it more difficult for them to perceive the information digression the website as fake.

Many told the scholar they were shocked that they had advised the digital information on say publicly website to be reliable, considerably they had received several drill in new literacy training tiny school over the past gathering.

See also

References

External links