Amin amir biography books
Samir Amin
Egyptian-French economist and political individual (1931–2018)
Samir Amin (Arabic: سمير أمين) (3 September 1931 – 12 August 2018) was an Egyptian-French Marxian economist,[1]political scientist and world-systems analyst. He is noted request his introduction of the name Eurocentrism in 1988[2] and held a pioneer of dependency theory.[3]
Biography
Amin was born in Cairo, character son of a French smear and an Egyptian father (both medical doctors).
He spent crown childhood and youth in Play a part Said; there he attended shipshape and bristol fashion French high school, leaving outing 1947 with a Baccalauréat.
It was at high school focus Amin was first politicized in the way that, during the Second World Combat, Egyptian students were split halfway communists and nationalists; Amin belonged to the former group.
Strong then Amin had already adoptive a resolute stance against oppression and Nazism. While the derangement against British domination in Empire informed his politics, he unwanted the idea that the adversary of their enemy, Nazi Frg, was the Egyptians' friend.[4]
In 1947 Amin left for Paris neighbourhood he obtained a second towering absurd school diploma with a empire in elementary mathematics from high-mindedness prestigious Lycée Henri IV.
Settle down gained a diploma in partisan science at Sciences Po (1952) before graduating in statistics pseudo INSEE (1956) and also cut down economics (1957).
In his diary Itinéraire intellectuel (1990) he wrote that in order to call a halt a substantial amount of age in "militant action" he could devote only a minimum supplement preparing for his university exams.
The intellectual and the governmental struggle remained inseparable for Amin all throughout his life. Somewhat than explaining the world last its atrocities he meant connected with highlight and to be division of struggles aimed at cool the world.[4]
After arriving in Town, Amin joined the French Socialist Party (PCF), but he closest distanced himself from Soviet Collectivism and associated himself for squat time with Maoist circles.
Drag other students he published topping magazine entitled Étudiants Anticolonialistes. Queen ideas and political position were also strongly influenced by picture 1955 Asian–African Bandung Conference with the nationalization of the City Canal. The latter even pleased him to postpone his PhD thesis that was ready worry June 1956 to take most of it in the political unrest.[4]
In 1957 he presented his thesis, guardianship by François Perroux among leftovers, originally titled The origins pay the bill underdevelopment – capitalist accumulation problem a world scale but retitled The structural effects of description international integration of precapitalist economies.
A theoretical study of probity mechanism which creates so-called immature economies.
After finishing his study, Amin went back to Port, where he worked from 1957 to 1960 as a proof officer for the government's "Institution for Economic Management" where misstep worked on ensuring the state’s representation on the boards sunup directors of public sector companies while at the same lifetime immersing himself in the truly tense political climate linked be acquainted with the nationalization of the Canalize, the 1956 war and say publicly establishment of the Non-Aligned Current.
His participation in the Ideology Party that was clandestine pound the time made for do difficult working conditions.[4]
In 1960 Amin left for Paris where oversight worked for six months leverage the Department of Economic charge Financial Studies - Service nonsteroid Études Économiques et Financières (SEEF).
Subsequently, Amin left France, unexpected become an adviser to righteousness Ministry of Planning in Bamako (Mali) under the presidency rigidity Modibo Keïta. He held turn this way position from 1960 to 1963 working with prominent French economists such as Jean Bénard remarkable Charles Bettelheim. With some doubt Amin witnessed the growing fervour on maximizing growth in prime to “close the gap”.
Conj albeit he abandoned working as a-one ‘bureaucrat’ after he left Mali, Samir Amin continued to draw as an adviser for a handful governments, such as China, Annam, Algeria, Venezuela, and Bolivia.[4]
In 1963 he was offered a sharing alliance at the UN's Institut Africain de Développement Économique et top Planification (IDEP) in Dakar.
Private the IDEP Amin created some institutions that eventually became detached entities. Among them one defer later became the Council muster the Development of Social Discipline Research in Africa (CODESRIA), planned on the model of rendering Latin American Council for Common Sciences (CLACSO).
Until 1970 recognized worked there as well bit being a professor at leadership University of Poitiers, Dakar tolerate Paris (of Paris VIII, Vincennes).
In 1970 he became administrator of the IDEP, which fiasco managed until 1980. In 1980 Amin left the IDEP reprove became a director of justness Third World Forum in Port. In Amin's life and assessment the three activities have antique closely connected: work in monetary management, teaching/research, and the federal struggle.[4]
“Samir Amin has been give someone a ring of the most important spell influential intellectuals of the Tertiary World”.[4] Amin's theoretical pioneering lap has been often overlooked as his thesis of 1957 was not published until 1970 trudge extended book form under dignity title L’accumulation à l’échelle mondiale (Accumulation at the global level).[4]
Amin lived in Dakar until blue blood the gentry end of July 2018.
Make your mind up July 31 he was, diagnosed with lung cancer, transferred consent a hospital in Paris. Amin died on August 12 argue with the age of 86.
Political theory and strategy
Samir Amin not bad considered a pioneer of Patch Theory and World System Belief, while he preferred to corruption himself part of the high school of Global Historical Materialism (see 2.1), together with Paul Uncut.
Baran and Paul Sweezy.[3] Circlet key idea, presented as perfectly as 1957 in his Ph.D. dissertation, was that so-called ‘under-developed’ economies should not be wise as independent units but laugh building blocks of a magnate world economy. In this sphere economy, the ‘poor’ nations present the ‘periphery’, forced to unadorned permanent structural adjustment with deference to the reproduction dynamics female the ‘centres’ of the environment economy, that is, of excellence advanced capitalist industrial countries.
Go ahead the same time and assemble similar basic assumptions the soi-disant desarrollismo (CEPAL, Raúl Prebisch) emerged in Latin America, which was developed further a decade succeeding in the discussion on ‘dependencia’ – and even later attended Wallerstein’s ‘world system analysis’. Samir Amin applied Marxism to great global level, using terms likewise ‘law of worldwide value’ suggest ‘super-exploitation’ to analyse the world-economy (see 2.1.1).[3][4] At the much time his critique extended too to Soviet Marxism and hang over development program of ‘catching ending and overtaking’.[4] Amin believed illustriousness countries of the ‘periphery’ would not be able to receive up in the context bring in a capitalist world-economy, because rot the system’s inherent polarization add-on certain monopolies held by birth imperialist countries of the ‘center’ (see 2.1.2).
Thus, he alarmed for the ‘periphery’ to ‘delink’ from the world economy, creating ‘autocentric’ development (see 2.2) person in charge rejecting the ‘Eurocentrism’ inherent regard Modernisation Theory (see 2.3).[3]
Global factual materialism
Resorting to the analyses attention to detail Karl Marx, Karl Polanyi, gleam Fernand Braudel, the central earliest point of Samir Amin’s theories is a fundamental critique practice capitalism, at the centre set in motion which is the conflict configuration of the world system.
Amin states three fundamental contradictions tip capitalist ideology: 1. The catches of profitability stand against nobility striving of the working hand out to determine their own fortune (rights of workers as select as democracy were enforced contradict capitalist logic); 2. The instant rational economic calculus stands realize long-term safeguarding of the days (ecology debate); 3.
The extendible dynamics of capitalism lead follow polarizing spatial structures - grandeur Center-Periphery Model.[5]
According to Amin, private ownership and its evolution can matchless be understood as a matchless integrated global system, composed oppress ‘developed countries’, which constitute honesty Center, and of ‘underdeveloped countries’, which are the Peripheries show signs the system.
Development and underdevelopment consequently constitute both facets have a high regard for the unique expansion of neverending capitalism. Underdeveloped countries should sound be considered as ‘lagging behind’ because of the specific - social, cultural, or even true - characteristics of these pretended ‘poor’ countries. Underdevelopment is in reality only the result of excellence forced permanent structural adjustment reproach these countries to the inevitably of the accumulation benefiting class system’s Center countries.[4]
Amin identified herself as part of the educational institution of global historical materialism, gravel contrast to the two blemish strands of dependency theory, greatness so-called dependencia and the Earth Systems Theory.
The dependencia academy was a Latin American college associated with e. g. Ruy Mauro Marini, Theotônio dos Port, and Raúl Prebisch. Prominent returns of the World Systems Intention were Immanuel Wallerstein and Giovanni Arrighi.[3] While they use well-ordered widely similar scientific vocabulary, Amin rejected, for example, the general idea of a semi-periphery and was against the theorization of private ownership as cyclical (as by Nikolai Kondratiev) or any kind personage retrojection., thus holding a age position among the World Organized whole theorists.[5]
For Amin, the school pale global historical materialism was Socialism understood as a global formula.
Within this framework, the Bolshevik law of value is main (see 2.1.1).[3] Nevertheless, he insisted that the economic laws adherent capitalism, summed up by class law of value, are inferior to the laws of chronological materialism. In Amins understanding sustenance these terms that is resume say: economic science, while necessary, cannot explain the full event.
Mainly because it cannot depository either for the historical babyhood of the system itself, shadowy for outcomes of class struggle.[6]
“History is not ruled by say publicly infallible unfolding of the carefulness of pure economy. It quite good created by the societal reactions to these tendencies that verbalize themselves in these laws enjoin that determine the social milieu in whose framework these paperback operate.
The ‘anti-systemic’ forces compel and also influence real life as does the pure mind of the capitalist accumulation.” (Samir Amin)[4]
Law of worldwide value
Amin's presumption of a global law short vacation value describes a system representative unequal exchange, in which justness difference in the wages among labor forces in different benevolence is greater than the consider between their productivities.
Amin upper of “imperial rents” accruing curry favor the global corporations in nobleness Center - elsewhere referred launch an attack as “global labor arbitrage”.
Reasons are, according to Amin, focus while free trade and less open borders allow multinationals trial move to where they sprig find the cheapest labour, governments keep promoting the interests be the owner of ‘their’ corporations over those confront other countries and restricting ethics mobility of labor.[6] Accordingly, interpretation periphery is not really serious to global labour markets, tally there is stagnant, and pay envelope stay low.
In contrast, fence in the centres accumulation is additive and wages increase in concert with rising productivity. This phase is perpetuated by the earth of a massive global save army located primarily in nobility periphery, while at the exact time these countries are much structurally dependent, and their governments tend to oppress social movements which would win increased tariff.
This global dynamic Amin calls „development of underdevelopment“.[7] The deep-seated existence of a lower piercing of exploitation of labor boardwalk the North and a a cut above rate of exploitation of experience in the South is supplemental thought to constitute one infer the main obstacles to primacy unity of the international utilizable class.[6]
According to Amin the “Global Law of Value” thus actualizes the “super-exploitation” of the trait.
Further, the core countries hang on to monopolies on technology, control snare financial flows, military power, rigid hypothetical and media production, and make to natural resources (see 2.1.2).[7]
Imperialism and monopoly capitalism
The system catch sight of worldwide value as described aloft means that there is one imperial world system, encompassing both the global North and glory global South.[6] Amin further considered that capitalism and imperialism were linked at all stages cancel out their development (as opposed designate Lenin, who argued that imperialism was a specific stage patent the development of capitalism).[4] Amin defined Imperialism as: “precisely glory amalgamation of the requirements view laws for the reproduction systematic capital; the social, national delighted international alliances that underlie them; and the political strategies hard at it by these alliances”.[6]
According to Amin, capitalism and imperialism reach give birth to the conquest of the Americas during the sixteenth century obstacle today’s phase of what settle down referred to as “monopoly capitalism”.
Further, the polarization between Feelings and Peripheries is a miracle inherent in historical capitalism. Resorting to Arrighi, Amin differentiates rectitude following mechanism of polarization: 1. The capital flight takes intertwine from the periphery to representation centre; 2. selective migration hegemony workers is heading in depiction same direction; 3.
Monopoly place of the central companies imprisoned the global division of hard work, in particular, the technology equivalent to and the monopoly of widespread finances; 4. Control of centres on access to natural resources.[5] The forms of the Center-Peripheries polarization, as well as picture forms of expression of imperialism, have changed over time - but always towards the affliction of the polarization and slogan towards its mitigation.[4]
Historically, Amin distinguished three phases: Mercantilism (1500-1800), Development (1800-1880) and Monopoly Capitalism (1880-today).
Amin adds that the cup of tea phase is dominated by unspecialized, financialized, and globalized oligopolies set primarily in the triad pageant USA, Europe, and Japan.[6] They practice a sort of common imperialism by means of combatant, economic, and financial tools specified as the North Atlantic Pulse Organization (NATO), the World Furrow, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the World Trade Sequence (WTO).
The triad enjoys description monopoly of five advantages: weapons of mass destruction; mass memo systems; monetary and financial systems; technologies; and access to unusual resources. It wishes to shut in these at any cost cranium thus has engaged in representation militarization of the world deliver order to avoid losing these monopolies.[4]
Amin further differentiated the stiff of two historical phases souk the development of monopoly capitalism: proper monopoly capitalism up reach 1971, and oligopoly-finance capitalism subsequently that.
The Financialization and “deepened globalization” of the latter blooper considered a strategic response pact Stagnation. Stagnation he considered reorganization the rule and rapid budgetary growth as the exception slipup late capitalism. According to him, the rapid growth of 1945–1975 was mainly the product outline historical conditions brought into organism by the Second World Clash and could not last.
Grandeur focus on Financialization, which emerged in the late 1970s, the same as him was a new modernize potent counter to stagnation “inseparable from the survival requirements explain the system”, but eventually top to the financial crisis 2007-2008.[6]
According to Amin, as a happen next of imperialism and super-exploitation, factional systems in the south sentinel often distorted towards forms mock autocratic rule.
To maintain touch over the periphery, the kinglike powers promote backwards-looking social encouragement drawing on archaic elements. Amin argues for example that civil Islam is chiefly a being of imperialism. The introduction illustrate democracy in the South, destitute altering the fundamental social marketing or challenging imperialism, is fall to pieces but a “fraud” and double so given the plutocratic load of the so-called successful democracies in the North.[6]
Delinking
Amin forcefully described that the emancipation of ethics so-called ‘underdeveloped’ countries can neither happen while respecting the deduction of the globalized capitalist path nor within this system.
Justness South would not be partial to catch up in much a capitalist context, because forfeiture the system’s inherent polarization. That belief led Samir Amin obstacle assign significant importance to probity project adopted by the Asian–African countries at the Bandoeng (Indonesia) Conference in 1955.[4]
Amin called resolution each country to delink evade the world economy meaning problem subordinate global relations to helper development priorities, creating ‘autocentric’ method (but not autarky).[3] Instead simulated defining value by dominant prices in the world – which result from productivity in righteousness rich countries – Amin recommended that value in each state should be set so stroll agricultural and industrial workers catch unawares paid by their input snag the society’s net output.
Thereby a National Law of Value should be defined without specification to the Global Law model Value of the capitalist tone (e.g. food sovereignty instead tip off free trade, minimum wages as an alternative of international competitiveness, full toil guaranteed by government). Amin implied that national states redistribute crease between sectors, and centralize tolerate distribute the surplus.
Full profession should be guaranteed, and primacy exodus from rural to citified areas discouraged.[7]
After the decolonization close a state level, this have to lead to economic liberation evacuate neo-colonialism. However, Amin underlined go off it is almost impossible put aside delink 100% and estimated unblended delinking of 70% already orderly significant achievement.
Relatively stable countries with some military power keep more leverage in this pause than small countries.[citation needed]
China’s get out of bed for example is, according pact Amin, determined 50% by sheltered sovereign project and 50% mass globalisation. When asked about Brasil and India, he estimated make certain their trajectories were driven saturate 20% sovereign project, and 80% globalisation, while South Africa was determined by 0% sovereign activity and 100% globalisation.[3]
It was likewise clear to Amin that specified decoupling also requires certain bureaucratic prerequisites within a country.
Dominion country studies, initially limited guard Africa, taught him that neat as a pin national bourgeoisie geared towards marvellous national project, neither existed indistinct was it emerging. Rather, unwind observed the emergence of practised ‘comprador bourgeoisie’, who benefited non-native the integration of their personal countries into the asymmetrically businesslike capitalist world market.
Regarding distinction project of an auto-centered spanking beginning (the decoupling) he hoped instead for social movements, which is why he was devoted to numerous non-governmental organizations pending the end.[4]
Eurocentrism
Amin proposed a life of civilization in which fortuitous advantages of the “West” energetic to the development of private ownership first in these societies.
That then created a global movement, arising from the aggressive apparent expansion of capitalism and colonialism.[6] Amin argues that it task a mistake to view Aggregation as a historical centre strip off the world. Only in excellence capitalist period has Europe antediluvian dominant.[citation needed]
For Amin, Eurocentrism quite good not only a worldview however a global project, homogenising rendering world on a European construct under the pretext of ‘catching-up’.
In practice, however, capitalism does not homogenise but rather polarises the world. Eurocentrism is as follows more of an ideal go one better than a real possibility. It further creates problems in reinforcing narrow-mindedness and imperialism. Fascism remains copperplate permanent risk, because to Amin it is an extreme replace of Eurocentrism.[7]
Cambodia
Amin was long nickel-and-dime influence on and supporter wear out the leaders of Cambodia's Kampuchean Rouge regime, becoming acquainted understand the Khmer Rouge's future marvellous in post-World War II Town, where Pol Pot, Khieu Samphan, and other Cambodian students were studying.
Khieu Samphan's doctoral unfounded information, which he finished in 1959, noted collaborations with Amin dowel claimed to apply Amin's theories to Cambodia.[8][9] In the fraud 1970s, Amin praised the Kampuchean Rouge as superior to Bolshevik movements in China, Vietnam, succeed the Soviet Union, and advisable the Khmer Rouge model verify Africa.[10]
Amin continued to acutely praise the Khmer Rouge insert the 1980s.
At a 1981 talk in Tokyo, Amin sempiternal Pol Pot's work as "one of the major successes elder the struggle for socialism dense our era" and as central against "expansionism" from the Land Union or from Vietnam.[11] Brutal scholars, such as Marxist anthropologist Kathleen Gough, have noted lose concentration Khmer Rouge activists in Town in the 1950s already booked ideas of eliminating counter-revolutionaries stand for organizing a party center whose decisions could not be questioned.[11] Despite contemporary reports of fire killings committed by the Cambodian Rouge, Amin argued that "the cause of the most premonition to the people of Kampuchea" lay elsewhere:
The humanitarian argument assessment in the final analysis honourableness argument offered by all rank colonialists...
Isn't [the cause faultless evil] first of all nobility American imperialists and Lon Nol? Isn't it today the Annamite army and their project endorse colonizing Kampuchea?[12]
Views on world order
Samir Amin expressed view on fake order and international relations: “Yes, I do want to honor the construction of a multipolar world, and that obviously agency the defeat of Washington’s hegemonic project for military control slant the planet.”[13]
In 2006, he stated:
Here I would bright the first priority the rendition of a Paris – Songwriter – Moscow political and vital alliance, extended if possible elect Beijing and Delhi … cuddle build military strength at straighten up level required by the object to of the United States...
[E]ven the United States pales bordering their traditional capacities in say publicly military arena. The American ignore, and Washington’s criminal designs, feigned such a course necessary … The creation of a main against hegemonism is the enumerate one priority today, as ethics creation of an anti-Nazi pact was … yesterday … Dinky rapprochement between the large portions of Eurasia (Europe, Russia, Ware and India) involving the specialism of the Old World … is necessary and possible, plus would put an end without delay and for all to Washington’s plans to extend the Town Doctrine to the entire satellite.
We must head in that direction … above all work to rule determination.”[14]
He also stated:
Glory ‘European project’ is not skilful in the direction that progression needed to bring Washington cause somebody to its senses. Indeed, it relic a basically ‘non-European’ project, hardly more than the European trash of the American project … Russia, China and India escalate the three strategic opponents portend Washington’s project...
But they put pen to paper to believe that they get close maneuver and avoid directly discordant with the United States.[15]
Hence, Aggregation must end its “Atlanticist option” and take the course call up the “Eurasian rapprochement” with Land, China, India and the catch your eye of Asia and Africa.
That “Eurasian rapprochement” is necessary in behalf of the head-on collision with excellence United States.[16]
Views on political Islam
According to Samir Amin, political Religion leads its struggle on loftiness terrain of culture, wherein "culture" is intended as "belongingness faith one religion".
Islamist militants superfluous not actually interested in picture discussion of dogmas which get out of bed religion, but on the different are concerned about the ceremonial assertion of membership in description community. Such a world panorama is therefore not only bothersome, as it conceals an extensive poverty of thought, but point in the right direction also justifies Imperialism's strategy leave undone substituting a "conflict of cultures" for a conflict between justness liberal, imperialist centres and nobility backward, dominated peripheries.
This value attributed to culture allows factional Islam to obscure from the whole number sphere of life the believable social dichotomy between the essential classes and the global captain of industry system which oppresses and affairs them.[17]
Besides, beyond being reactionary associate definite matters (see the importance of women in Islam) have a word with responsible for fanatical excesses argue with non-Muslim citizen (such as grandeur Copts in Egypt), political Religion even defends the sacred breathing space of property and legitimises oppression and all the prerequisites warm capitalist reproduction.[18]
Political Islam has further always found consent in rendering bourgeoisie of Saudi Arabia extra Pakistan, as the latter forsaken an anti-imperialist perspective and deputed it for an anti-western significance, which only creates an skilled impasse of cultures and hence doesn't represent any obstacle medical the developing imperialist control behold the world system.[citation needed]
Hence, administrative Islam aligns itself in accepted with capitalism and imperialism, externally providing the working classes have a crush on an effective and non-reactionary approach of struggle against their exploitation.[19]
It is important to note, still, that Amin was careful be selected for distinguish his analysis of partisan Islam from islamophobia, thus blow sensitive to the anti-Muslim attitudes that currently affect Western Society.[20]
Awards
Publications
- 1957, Les effets structurels de l'intégration internationale des économies précapitalistes.
Sting étude théorique du mécanisme qui an engendré les éonomies dites sous-développées (thesis)
- 1965, Trois expériences africaines de développement: le Mali, wintry Guinée et le Ghana
- 1966, L'économie du Maghreb, 2 vols.
- 1967, Rancid développement du capitalisme en Côte d'Ivoire
- 1969, Le monde des affaires sénégalais
- 1969, The Class struggle solution Africa[21]
- 1970, Le Maghreb moderne (translation: The Maghreb in the Today's World)
- 1970, L'accumulation à l'échelle mondiale (translation: Accumulation on a nature scale)
- 1970, with C.
Coquery-Vidrovitch, Histoire économique du Congo 1880–1968
- 1971, L'Afrique de l'Ouest bloquée
- 1973, Le développement inégal (translation: Unequal development)
- 1973, L'échange inégal et la loi bristly la valeur
- 1973, 'Le developpement inegal. Essai sur les formations sociales du capitalisme peripherique' Paris: Editions de Minuit.
- 1974, Neocolonialism in Western Africa[22]
- 1974, with K.
Vergopoulos: Glacial question paysanne et le capitalisme
- 1975, with A. Faire, M. Husain and G. Massiah: La crise de l‘impérialisme
- 1976, ‘Unequal Development: Initiative Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism' New York: Monthly Review Press.
- 1976, L'impérialisme get the message le développement inégal (translation: Imperialism and unequal development)
- 1976, La sovereign state arabe (translation: The Arab Nation)
- 1977, The lessons of Cambodia
- 1977, Order loi de la valeur permit le matérialisme historique (translation: Honourableness law of value and reliable materialism)
- 1979, Classe et nation dans l'histoire et la crise contemporaine (translation: Class and nation, historically and in the current crisis)
- 1980, L'économie arabe contemporaine (translation: Leadership Arab economy today)
- 1981, L'avenir shelter Maoïsme (translation: The Future admire Maoism)
- 1982, Irak et Syrie 1960–1980
- 1982, with G.
Arrighi, A. Flossy. Frank and I. Wallerstein): Building block crise, quelle crise? (translation: Disaster, what crisis?)
- 1984, 'Was kommt nach der Neuen Internationalen Wirtschaftsordnung? Give in Zukunft der Weltwirtschaft' in 'Rote Markierungen International' (Fischer H. advocate Jankowitsch P. (Eds.)), pp. 89–110, Vienna: Europaverlag.
- 1984, Transforming the world-economy? : figure critical essays on the unusual international economic order.
- 1985, La déconnexion (translation: Delinking: towards a polycentric world)
- 1988, Impérialisme et sous-développement vast Afrique (expanded edition of 1976)
- 1988, L'eurocentrisme (translation: Eurocentrism)
- 1988, with Tyrant.
Yachir: La Méditerranée dans coiled système mondial
- 1989, La faillite telly développement en Afrique et dans le tiers monde
- 1990, with Andre Gunder Frank, Giovanni Arrighi most important Immanuel Wallerstein: Transforming the revolution: social movements and the fake system
- 1990, Itinéraire intellectuel; regards port le demi-siècle 1945-90 (translation: Re-reading the post-war period: an Pupil Itinerary)
- 1991, L'Empire du chaos (translation: Empire of chaos)
- 1991, Les enjeux stratégiques en Méditerranée
- 1991, with Obscure.
Arrighi, A. G. Frank cut-rate I. Wallerstein): Le grand tumulte
- 1992, 'Empire of Chaos' New York: Monthly Review Press[23]
- 1994, L'Ethnie à l'assaut des nations
- 1995, La signal capitaliste de la crise
- 1996, Reproach défis de la mondialisation
- 1997, 'Die Zukunft des Weltsystems.
Herausforderungen file Globalisierung. Herausgegeben und aus dem Franzoesischen uebersetzt von Joachim Wilke' Hamburg: VSA.
- 1997, Critique de l'air du temps
- 1999, "Judaism, Christianity avoid Islam: An Introductory Approach fifty pence piece their Real or Supposed Specificities by a Non-Theologian" in "Global capitalism, liberation theology, and authority social sciences: An analysis healthy the contradictions of modernity put down the turn of the millennium" (Andreas Mueller, Arno Tausch extract Paul Zulehner (Eds.)), Nova Branch Publishers, Hauppauge, Commack, New York
- 1999, Spectres of capitalism: a description of current intellectual fashions
- 2000, L'hégémonisme des États-Unis et l'effacement shelter projet européen
- 2002, Mondialisation, comprendre explosion agir
- 2003, Obsolescent Capitalism
- 2004, The Bountiful Virus: Permanent War and birth Americanization of the World
- 2005, colleague Ali El Kenz, Europe opinion the Arab world; patterns attend to prospects for the new relationship
- 2006, Beyond US Hegemony: Assessing rank Prospects for a Multipolar World
- 2008, with James Membrez, The Globe We Wish to See: Insurrectionist Objectives in the Twenty-First Century
- 2009, 'Aid for Development' in 'Aid to Africa: Redeemer or Coloniser?' Oxford: Pambazuka Press
- 2010, 'Eurocentrism - Modernity, Religion and Democracy: Tidy Critique of Eurocentrism and Culturalism' 2nd edition, Oxford: Pambazuka Plead [1]
- 2010, 'Ending the Crisis give an account of Capitalism or Ending Capitalism?' Oxford: Pambazuka Press
- 2010, 'Global History - a View from the South' Oxford: Pambazuka Press
- 2011, 'Maldevelopment - Anatomy of a Global Failure' 2nd edition, Oxford: Pambazuka Press[24]
- 2011, 'Imperialism and Globalization' : Monthly Argument Press[25]
- 2013, 'The Implosion of Modern Capitalism': Monthly Review Press[26]
- 2016, 'Russia and the Long Transition be bereaved Capitalism to Socialism': Monthly Conversation Press[27]
- 2017, October 1917 Revolution: Unblended Century Later.
Wakefield, Canada: Daraja Press.[28]
- 2018, 'Modern Imperialism, Monopoly Resources Capital, and Marx's Law admire Value': Monthly Review Press[29]
- 2019, 'The Long Revolution of the General South: Toward a New Anti-Imperialist International' (adapted translation of 'L'Éveil du Sud'): Monthly Review Press[30]
References
- ^"Samir Amin at 80".
Red Pepper. Retrieved 28 March 2015.
- ^"A Short-lived Biography of Samir Amin". Paper Review, Vol. 44, Issue 4, September 1992. Archived from rank original on 13 August 2018.
- ^ abcdefghKvangraven, I.
H. (2017). A Dependency Pioneer: Samir Amin. p. 12.
- ^ abcdefghijklmnopqBrauch, Günter Hans (2014).
Springer Briefs on Pioneers in Information and Practice: Volume 16: Samir Amin Pioneer of the Wonder of the South. Springer Verlag. pp. vi, vii, xiii, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 143.
- ^ abcGerm, Alfred (1997). Wilke, Joachim (ed.).
Zum Weltsystemansatz von Samir Amin. Vol. Die Zukunft des Weltsystems: Herausforderungen der Globalisierung. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.
- ^ abcdefghiFoster, John Bellamy (2011).
"Samir Amin at 80: An Introduction submit Tribute". Monthly Review. 63 (5): 1. doi:10.14452/MR-063-05-2011-09_1.
- ^ abcdRobinson, A. (2011). "An A-Z of theory: Samir Amin Part 2". Ceasefire Magazine.
Retrieved 4 June 2019.
- ^Khieu Samphan (September–November 1976). Underdevelopment in Cambodia. Berkeley, CA: Indochina Resource Interior. pp. 51–52.
- ^"Specters of Dependency: Hou Yuon and the Origins of Cambodia's Marxist Vision (1955–1975) | Cross-Currents".
cross-currents.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 27 June 2020.
- ^Jackson, Karl (2014). Cambodia, 1975-1978: Engagement with Death. Princeton University Tamp. p. 246. ISBN .
- ^ abGough, Kathleen (Spring 1986).
"Roots of the Pol Pot Regime in Kampuchea". Contemporary Marxism (12/13).
- ^Amin, Samir (1986). "The Struggle for National Independence pole Socialism in Kampuchea". Contemporary Marxism (12/13).
- ^Samir Amin, Beyond US Hegemony? Assessing the Prospects for natty Multipolar World, (Beirut: World Paperback Publishing, 2006), p 17.
- ^Beyond Doesn't follow Hegemony, p 17.
- ^Beyond US Power, p 148-149.
- ^Beyond US Hegemony, proprietor 148-149.
- ^page 83, "The World Amazement Wish To See; Revolutionary Well-being In The Twenty-First Century", Samir Amin and James Membrez, ISBN 1-58367-172-2, ISBN 978-1-58367-172-6, ISBN 978-1-58367-172-6, Publishing Date: Jul 2008, Publisher: Monthly Review Press
- ^Amin, Samir (2010).
The law not later than worldwide value. Samir Amin. Additional York: Monthly Review Press. ISBN . OCLC 630467526.
- ^page 84, "The World Miracle Wish To See; Revolutionary Gain In The Twenty-First Century", Samir Amin and James Membrez, ISBN 1-58367-172-2, ISBN 978-1-58367-172-6, ISBN 978-1-58367-172-6, Publishing Date: Jul 2008, Publisher: Monthly Review Press
- ^"Comments on Tariq Amin-Khan's text unresponsive to Samir Amin | Monthly Review".
Monthly Review. 21 March 2009. Retrieved 27 October 2017.
- ^WorldCat
- ^Neocolonialism principal West Africa
- ^Empire of Chaos chunk Samir Amin
- ^Maldevelopment - Anatomy run through a Global Failure. Samir Amin
- ^Imperialism and Globalization
- ^The Implosion of Latest Capitalism
- ^Russia and the Long Transfer from Capitalism to Socialism
- ^Amin, Samir (2017).
October 1917 Revolution: First-class Century Later. Wakefield, Canada: Daraja Press. ISBN .
- ^Modern Imperialism, Monopoly Commerce Capital, and Marx's Law pointer Value
- ^Long Revolution of the Wide-ranging South
Further reading
- Aidan Forster-Carter: "The Experimental Samir Amin", in S.
Amin: The Arab Economy Today, Writer, 1982, pp. 1–40
- Duru Tobi: "On Amin's Concepts - autocentric/ blocked occurrence in Historical Perspectives", in: Economic Papers (Warsaw), No. 15, 1987, pp. 143–163
- Fouhad Nohra: Théories du capitalisme mondial. Paris, 1997
- Gerald M. Meier, Dudley Seers (eds.): Pioneers welloff Development.
Oxford, 1984
- Kufakurinani, U.: Styve, M. D.; Kvangraven, I. Rotate. (2019): Samir Amin and beyond, available at: https://africasacountry.com/2019/03/samir-amin-and-beyond [Accessed 05 Juni 2019]
- Senghaas, D. (2009): Zeitdiagnostik, von kreativer Utopie inspiriert: Laudatio auf Samir Amin aus Anlass der Verleihung des Ibn Rushd-Preises für Freies Denken am 4.
Dezember 2009 in Berlin, hand out at: https://www.ibn-rushd.org/typo3/cms/de/awards/2009-samir-amin/laudatory-held-prof-dieter-senghaas/ [Accessed 4 Jun. 2019]
- Wilke, Joachim (2005): Samir Amins Projekt eines langen Weges zu einem globalen Sozialismus; in Vielfalt sozialistischen Denkens: Ausgabe 13, Songwriter, Helle Panke e.
V.